Talk:Stop trolling RD campaign !

From Rodovid Engine

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] About Marcomir?

Charles, what is the problem with Marcomir? You didn't tell it ! --Christophe Tesson - talk. 18:40, 18 July 2015 (EEST)

[edit] Response

I have looked through your arguments and some are valid, some are not, and some are simple meanness tied up with bullshit (changes that I never made, and other forms of sabotage), so rather than have you waste your precious time that you could have spent actually being productive waging an organized smear campaign... I hereby request that ALL OF MY EDITS EVERY SINGLE RECORD THAT I HAVE EVER TOUCHED IN THIS DATABASE TOGETHER WITH ALL COMMENTS including all of the valuable and correct ones AND EVERYTHING ELSE BE DELETED. Go ahead and throw the baby out with the bath water and simply start over. I NO LONGER CARE. Almoustine 05:36, 25 August 2015 (EEST)

Almoustine, we have warned you so many times to respect rules and collaborate with others that is the normal consequences of your acts.
About your request; I would be very happy to delete your work if I could but Baya ask clearly to not doing that ! and by the fact it is a CreativeCommons licence the data you add is not yours; so it will be not possible to clam to delete you work on the single point that is you who add this. --Charles 13:06, 25 August 2015 (EEST)
"some are valid, some are not". So then, Almoustine, tell us wich ones are valid, wich are not. So then, though we don't agree, we can work together.
Anyway, do what you want. --Christophe Tesson - talk. 16:32, 26 August 2015 (EEST)

[edit] 2nd response

FOLLOWING ARE RECORDS OF INTEREST TO GENEALOGISTS AND HISTORIANS The lit of records below should not be deleted but rather noted as controversial in Rodovid. Traditionally many of them have been end of line and dismissed as legendary or mythical, however there is enough sources to warrant further investiation as many of them seem to be instances of amalgamated heros. Research continues with regard to proving or disproving the historacity of these individuals. Please see the discussion pages for each of these individuals for more infomration. Your respectful collaboration is requested Almoustine 19:32, 14 October 2015 (EEST)

Almoustine it is not the best way to process (asking other to not respect rules) -> Please ask for rules modification it is the commum vector for everybody; I'm agree with you that we really need to up-date these rules to integrate the possibility of the new engine !
We allthow need to have a clear definition of what should be marked as "Hystorical literature", as "Hypothesis", as "Miths", as "Fictional"; I'm not sure that everybody have same definition --Charles 14:47, 16 October 2015 (EEST)

It's obvious that these tags have fantasy translation in Rodovid.EN. The first version was:

  1. First hand source = Parish records and civil records
  2. second hand source = genealogical books

etc. It has been completely transformed, and become useless. --Christophe Tesson - talk. 18:16, 24 April 2016 (EEST)

Personal tools