Controversies
From Rodovid Engine
[edit] First edition conflict
Well, ladies and gentlemen, now we're in problems, see this first controversy:
This is the record of a biblical character. We all know that there was lots of controversies about each of these characters...
And there is an english admin who prefers another source, to tell that this character is the son of somebody else.
What shall we do? For each character cited in biblical genealogies, we will find sources telling that, in fact this person is the son of somebody else.
Shall we, as this english admin, prefer the particular source, and explode the original biblical tree at each level?
Or keep the biblical tree and note alternative version on each record?
IMHO there's no doubt, these alternative sources have to be cited in note field, not in family links tab.
Do we really need to have a vote?
(Excuse my globish...) --Christophe Tesson - talk. 12:39, 5 September 2010 (EEST)
- Make a template - there are another versions of this persons. See 1) 2) 3) ....--Igor 12:38, 6 September 2010 (EEST)
- ?? I don't understand... What kind of template? What is 1) 2) 3) ?? --Christophe Tesson - talk. 23:46, 6 September 2010 (EEST)
